beaujolais_signBeaujolais ‘sugar ring’ fined heavily as supermarkets escape with light sentences
The wine producers in the Beaujolais sugar case have been found guilty of illegally adding sugar to their wine and fined up to US$27,000 each – much higher than originally demanded by the prosecution.

The state prosecutor had originally requested between US$950 and US$2,000 in fines from the 53 growers and producers accused of over chaptalising.

Although chaptalisation – adding sugar to wine – is legal, the winemakers were found to have increased the alcohol in their wines by over 2% (the legal limit in the region). The court heard that the winemakers had increased alcohol levels by between 2 and 2.7%.

Although the state prosecutor originally requested between US$67,500-140,000 from the supermarkets and suspended prison sentences for four of their directors, the court instructed the supermarkets to pay US$5,400-27,000 each. Continue

However, the fines handed out to the winemakers may cripple many of them.

‘We’re stunned. The sentences are destructive. Some haven’t sold their wines for two years and are living on their wives’ salaries. These fines could push them to close down,’ said defending lawyer Michel Desilets.

Desilets said some winemakers intended to appeal.

In total, the court ordered the winemakers to pay US$160,500 as well as US$4,000 in damages to a consumers’ association, the CLCV.

The ruling was condemned by the local wine trade body. Talking to decanter.com, Dominique Capart, president of Interbeaujolais said that such a harsh judgement ‘must never happen again.’

‘They didn’t take into account the winemaker’s good intentions and the difficulties of the 2004 vintage,’ said Capart. ‘A large number of them had only slightly gone over the limits.’

The FDSEA agricultural union said the winemakers were ‘victims of poorly-adapted legisation’. It highlighted the difference between Beaujolais, where chaptalisation can only be used to add 2% alcohol, and Champagne or the Loire, where, in difficult years, producers can add 2.5 to 3%.

One of the winemakers said he was ‘disgusted’ by the findings of the court.

‘We want to make a good product, we didn’t take the risk of ending up in court lightly, but we didn’t have a choice – no one would have bought an 11% wine,’ he said.

The two intermediaries, who bought and distributed the sugar from Intermarché without any bills or receipts, were given suspended sentences (6 and 12 months) and fines of US$33,700 and US$47,200.

By Oliver Styles, and Suzannah Ramsdale – Decanter.com

Tags: , ,

Comments are closed.